From: Richard M Kreuter <kreuter@pr...> - 2008-11-19 14:45:54
> Since SBCL already has a directory function it should have
> non-truenames listing which is, in my humble oppinion, a must.
If you care about having your program port across implementations, you'd
be better off using some third party library than depending on
If you only care about running on SBCL, you'll probably save yourself
some grief in the long run by listing directories with routines in
As for your patch, I have two issues:
(1) Adding keywords to PROBE-FILE is out of the question. A call to
PROBE-FILE with more than one argument is likely not to compile on
other conforming implementations. As far as I can tell, you could
have DIRECTORY call QUERY-FILE-SYSTEM directly, rather than go
(2) It seems to me that there can be more than one way for a pathname
not to be a "truename", even granting that "truename" is a hazy
notion. So if DIRECTORY will have an argument to control symlink
resolution, I'd rather the argument be something like
:RESOLVE-SYMLINKS rather than :TRUENAMES.
I think I would not object to including the feature if you addressed
these two points.
From: Richard M Kreuter <kreuter@pr...> - 2008-11-19 14:49:22
Richard M Kreuter writes:
> I think I would not object to including the feature if you addressed
> these two points.
And please submit patches in unified diff format (the output format of