[ Ooops - hit reply without noticing I was sending only to Erik, not the list.
> > I.e., using array-in-bounds-p in a tight loop on an array of known
> > dimensions. Disassembling #'test shows that it contains a dynamic call to
> > #'array-in- bounds-p, that I think can and should be optimized away in
> > this case.
> I don't see any declarations w.r.t. speed, safety, etc. Does a
> declaration for maximum speed (and minimum of the others) not achieve
> the same?
No. Even with these aggressive settings, there's still the dynamic call to
#'array-in-bounds-p; and timings are exactly the same (which is why I left out