From: William Harold Newman <william.newman@ai...> - 2001-12-30 23:31:12
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 07:46:13PM +0000, Daniel Barlow wrote:
> I tried building current CVS (0.pre7.106) yesterday on Alpha. It
> mostly works; there are a couple of typos, one change I don't
> understand the necessity for but believe should be harmless, and some
> missing header files to get a LDB-enabled build.
> The question: where does/should SUBNAMES_WIDETAG come from? I renamed
> the references in print.c back to subtype_Names as was, which still
> exists and works.
It looks like a case of bleary-eyed global search-and-replace leading
to garbled nonsense. Then, since I haven't been using or even building
with ldb, and all the uses of the screwed-up names seem to be
conditionalized on defined(LISP_FEATURE_SB_LDB), I didn't notice the
As an immediate fix, I'll apply the patch. For the future, I'll try to
be more careful to test code that I edit, and more careful when
editing code that I can't test.
William Harold Newman <william.newman@...>
HAPPY HACKING TO ALL, AND I'LL BE BACK NEXT YEAR!
PGP key fingerprint 85 CE 1C BA 79 8D 51 8C B9 25 FB EE E0 C3 E5 7C