From: Martin Atzmueller <martin@at...> - 2001-02-19 17:41:17
is bug 9 gone?
According to BUGS it is not, but according to the comment in
src/pcl/boot.lisp, line 596, maybe it is gone ...
Could you (William), elaborate on this please, if you did not
already fix it?
Martin Atzmueller <martin@...>
From: William Harold Newman <william.newman@ai...> - 2001-02-19 18:30:36
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:41:10PM +0100, Martin Atzmueller wrote:
> is bug 9 gone?
> According to BUGS it is not, but according to the comment in
> src/pcl/boot.lisp, line 596, maybe it is gone ...
Yes, it's gone; I just forgot to delete the BUGS entry.
Probably I should have put a test case in the BUGS entry, something
(defstruct foo x y)
(defmethod frob ((foo foo))
(declare (ignore foo))
Compiling this under my old Debian CMU CL 2.4.17 gives
Warning: In defmethod (FROB NIL (FOO)), there is a
redundant ignore declaration for the parameter (FOO).
Sufficiently old SBCL signalled a similar warning. In current
SBCL the code compiles without complaint.
William Harold Newman <william.newman@...>
PGP key fingerprint 85 CE 1C BA 79 8D 51 8C B9 25 FB EE E0 C3 E5 7C