Re: [Sbcl-devel] Bugs 140, 176 and sbcl-0.7.5

[Pierre R\. M. <pm...@pm...>]

Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> writes:

> > In any case, I'd not want to
> > release cmucl 18e/19a (or whatever it's going to be) with either of
> > the two bugs present, but I think the situation for SBCL differs,
> > since you release much more frequently, and you're still below version
> > 1.0.0 ;)
> 
> Be that as it may, I've reversed the change in sbcl-0.7.4.42, so
> sbcl-0.7.5 should release without bug 176.

Just to clarify myself:  I didn't mean to imply that sbcl-0.7.5 should
release with bug 176, but rather that releasing with bug 140 unfixed
(thereby preventing the more severe 176) was fine, IMHO.

Regs, Pierre.

-- 
Pierre R. Mai <pm...@pm...>                    http://www.pmsf.de/pmai/
 The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
 is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
 We cause accidents.                           -- Nathaniel Borenstein