From: Raymond W. <Ray...@fa...> - 2002-01-07 14:44:32
|
Christophe Rhodes writes: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 04:43:38PM +0100, Raymond Wiker wrote: > > Martin Atzmueller writes: > > > I suppose this happened while building sbcl-07pre112 with sbcl-07pre112 > > > ... > > > Well, I just built sbcl-07pre112 with itself (on X86/Linux), so I guess > > > this is really specific to FreeBSD. > > > > No, I'm using 0.pre7.34. I had the same problem building > > 0.pre7.110 a couple of days back, but I got managed to get a running > > lisp image by by telling the compiler to accept the generated (and > > possibly faulty) deb-int.lisp-obj. I guess I could try using > > 0.pre7.110 to build 0.pre7.112... > > My advice in this instance is to build with cmucl (which works on > FreeBSD, right?); some of the pre7s build themselves but not other > versions, so starting from something that is "known OK" is probably > sensible... I was able to use the built-with-possibly-faulty-deb-int.lisp-obj sbcl to build 0.pre7.117, with no problems. I was also able to build directly from an even earlier version of 0.pre7.X (X = 10, I think). The CVS log for deb-int.lisp shows that this was a known problem at some point, with a fix that involved stubbing out FIND-ESCAPED-FRAME. //Raymond. |