Re: [Sbcl-devel] freeze for sbcl-1.2.15

[Martin C. <cra...@co...>]

Jan Moringen wrote on Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:12:18PM +0200: 
> Hi Martin.
> 
> On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 18:31 -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> 
> > Wondering what the outcome of these warnings and Quicklisp was.
> > 
> > The new warnings turn out to be a bigger problem for me than I
> > thought.
> 
> Can you elaborate? The extended deprecation sub-system is pretty new
> and can still be changed if it turns out to be flawed.

The way I remembered the outcome is that most things in Quicklisp got
cleaned up for the resulting warnings.  But now I can't find the
reference to it, maybe it was on a different mailing list.

Personally I have to deal with a couple imported libraries that don't
like me having updated to the new SBCL, and we generally treat
warnings as errors.  I have to decide how I want to handle that
(ignore warnings, fix warnings, update libraries, disable warnings
etc).

So I was just looking what other people did.

Martin

> Thanks and kind regards,
> Jan
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Sbcl-devel mailing list
> Sbc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel

-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauer <cra...@co...>   http://www.cons.org/cracauer/