From: Robert P. G. <rpg...@si...> - 2015-03-15 19:05:13
|
Jan Moringen wrote: > On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 11:52 -0500, Robert P. Goldman wrote: >> Jan Moringen wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 12:48 -0400, Zach Beane wrote: >>> >>>> The failure report is intimidating, with more than 50 systems >>>> failing due to the new deprecation full warnings: >>>> >>>> http://report.quicklisp.org/2015-03-12/failure-report.html >>>> >>>> I think fixing a few key libraries would help fix many of the failures, >>>> but there's still a lot of fail to go around around. >>>> >>>> What do you think about a group effort to inform authors of the issues >>>> introduced by these deprecation changes? >>> Here is a partial list of root causes based on the linked report: >>> >>> xmls: quit >> I'm the maintainer of record for XMLS. Here's what it has: >> >> >> #+sbcl (sb-ext:exit :code 0) > > There seems to be a mismatch between the code Zach tried to build and > your code. The above code does not signal any deprecation warnings or > errors with non-ancient SBCLs. To be honest, I don't know where Zach gets his copy. XMLS does not have a source repository. When Drew (?) was maintaining it, we pulled a copy of the source over into my company's SVN repo of lisp utilities. I've put patches onto that version and pushed tarballs to the cl.net page. I understand Xach's preference for source repository, but I don't have the energy to maintain a separate, public source repo. I think CXML is more popular than XMLS these days, anyway. cheers, r |