Re: [Sbcl-devel] Upcoming freeze for 1.0.31

[Leslie P. P. <sk...@vi...>]

Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> "Leslie P. Polzer" <sk...@vi...> writes:
>>
>>   * Timer starvation
>>     http://marc.info/?l=sbcl-devel&m=124903006627164&w=4
>>
>>   * RUN-PROGRAM :INPUT T
>>     http://marc.info/?l=sbcl-devel&m=124972037829724&w=4
>>
>> Especially that last one would be important for me.
>
> I'm afraid that, since neither of these is in my general area of
> competence, I'm unwilling to merge these at this point in the cycle
> (because I'm not confident that I could fix any issues that came up, and
> because the lack of test cases mean that I'm not even confident that
> issues with them would be spotted in any reasonable timeframe).  I'd be
> happy if some other committer can take that responsibility, or else they
> should probably go in early in the next cycle so that they can be
> exposed to more workloads.

Would this be an appropriate point in time then?

Additionally, would it help if I volunteered to fix issues
that may come up with these patches?

 Thank you,

   Leslie

-- 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/polzer