From: Nikodemus S. <nik...@ra...> - 2009-07-10 16:13:22
|
2009/7/10 Zach Beane <xa...@xa...>: > The instructions are clear, and they seem to work, but I don't think > I've seen anyone mention this issue before anywhere. > > Do people with lots of installed RAM regularly (or irregularly) run > into this configuration issue? Is my operating system's default value > to blame? Is it one of those "fix once and forget" issues? I has cropped up on the lists before, and at least one Lisp company uses larger than default page size for SBCL for the same reason. (Larger page-size may have undesirable effects on GC write-protect granularity, but I'm not sure if increasing the number of separate mappings has possible system-wide performance implications.) Cheers, -- Nikodemus |