From: <fa...@gm...> - 2005-09-27 21:08:00
|
Yes, you should contact the darwinports maintainers or whoever botched that shell script: he may have botched more. That said, I won't cast the first stone. [ Fran=E7ois-Ren=E9 =D0VB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tu= nes.org ] -- Question authority! -- Yeah, says who? On 27/09/05, Jason Dagit <da...@ee...> wrote: > Oh, that's is weird, on OSX sbcl is just a script. Yeah, just made > your suggested change and all seems to be well now. > > So I guess the darwinports maintainers are the ones to notify? > > Thanks, > Jason > > On Sep 27, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Far=E9 wrote: > > > On 27/09/05, Jason Dagit <da...@ee...> wrote: > > > >> Actually, I was typing the example below directly from bash :( > >> > > Yes, but is your $(which sbcl) an actual binary, or a lousy script? > > > > > >>> Sounds like you have a wrapper shell script that uses $@ instead of > >>> "$@", which would work with zsh, but doesn't with sh, bash, etc. > >>> Been > >>> there, done that. > >>> > > > > [ Fran=E7ois-Ren=E9 =D0VB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http:// > > fare.tunes.org ] > > In a five year period we can get one superb programming language. > > Only we can't control when the five year period will begin. -- Alan > > Perlis |