I'd like to start using NAMED-LAMBDA in some of my code to make it easier to debug. The library will eventually end up public, however, and I don't want to release it into the wild with such a hack...

so I'd like to organize a friendly `named-lambda' asdf system that defines a generic NAMED-LAMBDA, which works as well as it can on implementations it knows about and resorts to the FLET hack in the others.

What are the chances of  SB-EXT::NAMED-LAMBDA ever turning into SB-EXT:NAMED-LAMBDA? opinions? comments?

take care

Nick