Elliott Slaughter <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:What was the last version where sb-concurrency wasn't broken?
> For lack of any strong consensus, I made the decision to unleash 1.1.8 for
> Windows on the world. Remember that sb-concurrency is broken, so if you
> care about that, don't upgrade. (Or better: provide a patch so that we can
> get this fixed.) I am hoping that the majority of Windows users do not yet
> depend on this feature and thus will be able to upgrade without trouble.