On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Stas Boukarev <stassats@gmail.com> wrote:
Elliott Slaughter <elliottslaughter@gmail.com> writes:

> For lack of any strong consensus, I made the decision to unleash 1.1.8 for
> Windows on the world. Remember that sb-concurrency is broken, so if you
> care about that, don't upgrade. (Or better: provide a patch so that we can
> get this fixed.) I am hoping that the majority of Windows users do not yet
> depend on this feature and thus will be able to upgrade without trouble.
What was the last version where sb-concurrency wasn't broken?

The breakage occurred between 1.1.4 and 1.1.5. I've got a build log from 1.1.5 which demonstrates the failure:

https://elliottslaughter.com/files/build_sbcl_1.1.5-x86-windows.txt

--
Elliott Slaughter

"Don't worry about what anybody else is going to do. The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - Alan Kay