From: Tim F. <tfe...@br...> - 2014-06-12 13:41:30
|
I’m pretty sure there’s no good reason, but that there are just a couple of places left in our code where buffer sizing predates the introduction of Defaults.BUFFER_SIZE and which we didn’t catch and fix at the time. Pull request very welcome! Thanks, -t On Jun 12, 2014, at 9:25 AM, Louis Letourneau <lou...@ma...> wrote: > I was wondering why IndexedFastaSequenceFile has it's own buffer vs using Default.BUFFER_SIZE > > Or at least, have a programmatic way to set it if there is the need for it to not use Default.BUFFER_SIZE? > > I can send a pull request if you'd like. > > Thanks > Louis > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems > _______________________________________________ > Samtools-devel mailing list > Sam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/samtools-devel |