From: Thomas Leonard <tal00r@ec...> - 2002-09-29 09:42:35
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:08:55PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:20:20AM +0200, Karol Krenski wrote:
> > > Thomas: ROX-Filer is good enough. Time to let it lie, and give us a
> > > text editor as well. :-)
> > Yeah, I can't think of anything more that I'd need from rox. What are
> > the future plans?
> - panels with selectable height and scalable icons
Yes, icon scaling everywhere needs to be more flexible. We should probably
move the standard size to be in line with GNOME, too.
> - all command line options in Options (like -o at now)
> - sort patch included in upstream version (just like in my Debian rox-cvs)
I'd like to see this pop up a menu instead of cycling through the sort
types. It's really hard to see what the current order is!
Probably the sort types should have their own submenu from Display, so we
can display the same menu in both places.
Also, they should be named like 'Biggest first' instead of 'Sort by
> - marking as appdirs directories with AppInfo.xml instead of AppRun
Possibly, but very un-backwards compatible!
> - shadowed font on pinboard
Easy enough... want to send a patch?
[ Replies should probably be to rox-devel ]
Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
From: Robert Davison <robert.rdw2klt01@ha...> - 2002-10-02 01:09:17
29/09/2002 10:35:07, Thomas Leonard <tal00r@...>
>> - marking as appdirs directories with AppInfo.xml instead of
>Possibly, but very un-backwards compatible!
How difficult would it be to make ROX automatically support and
recognise Next/MacOS X/Window Maker style application
directories? As there seem to be quite a few Window Maker users
and also a MacOS X distro of ROX.
To avoid bloat, this could be left perhaps as a compile-time
option for users who might want it.
These directories just seem to end in .app and use a tiff file of
the same name as the folder inside for the icon (from memory).