From: Jan W. <ja...@di...> - 2000-12-27 17:14:46
|
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Thomas A Leonard wrote: [rox_1.0.0-1_i386.deb" and "rox-base_1.0.0-1_i386.deb"] > Looks good! Only two minor points: > > - For the RPMs, we didn't include the 'src' directory - it makes the > package quite a bit larger! > > - title="Rox (Risc Os on X)" should probably be "ROX (RISC OS on X)" to > stop pedants (like me ;-) complaining about the case... OK, I have created rox_1.0.0-2_i386.deb with the correct title and without the 'src' directory. BTW. I have compiled ROX without vfs support because I can not find a .deb package that contains a valid libvfs (vfs.h). If someone can points me to a libvfs.deb then I will compile it with vfs-support. > I'll put them up now unless someone complains (I haven't actually tested > them). I have uploaded the new "rox_1.0.0-2_i386.deb" to "http://home.tiscalinet.be/linux-asm/rox/". BTW, What do I do in the future? Can I send the .deb's that I have created directly to you? Or do you prefer another method? Regards - Jan Wagemakers - |