From: Stephen W. <st...@ke...> - 2007-02-10 11:22:27
|
"Thomas Leonard" <ta...@gm...> wrote: > Just noticed some news articles about ROX: > > http://applications.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/02/01/1820222&tid=26&tid=13 > > http://osnews.com/story.php/17197/ROX-Desktop-Provides-Light-Quirky-Alternative-to-GNOME-KDE > > http://software.newsforge.com/software/07/02/01/1821206.shtml?tid=130 > > (one article, linked by two other sites) I've just checked the bandwidth usage on my main rox site: Tue Feb 6 2007, 801 Requests, totalling 25 MB /pics/ 164 Requests, totalling 12 MB /rox/ 335 Requests, totalling 12 MB /2005/ 102 Requests, totalling 0 MB / 25 Requests, totalling 0 MB /2006/ 102 Requests, totalling 0 MB Wed Feb 7 2007, 7055 Requests, totalling 221 MB /pics/ 2057 Requests, totalling 182 MB /rox/ 397 Requests, totalling 27 MB /2005/ 4433 Requests, totalling 11 MB /2006/ 41 Requests, totalling 0 MB / 13 Requests, totalling 0 MB Thu Feb 8 2007, 4750 Requests, totalling 371 MB /pics/ 3094 Requests, totalling 317 MB /2006/ 230 Requests, totalling 0 MB /2005/ 454 Requests, totalling 0 MB /rox/ 748 Requests, totalling 52 MB Fri Feb 9 2007, 4593 Requests, totalling 148 MB /2005/ 2171 Requests, totalling 3 MB /pics/ 1149 Requests, totalling 110 MB /2006/ 598 Requests, totalling 0 MB /rox/ 541 Requests, totalling 31 MB So the articles seem to have generated a lot of interest. I'm impressed by the way /2005 got 11 MB on the wednesday, as that only contains 0launch interfaces! -- Stephen Watson http://www.kerofin.demon.co.uk/ If you read this on a mailing list, send any reply back to the list and not to me. Not even CC. Stranded here on planet earth / It's not much but it could be worse |