From: Werner K. <wer...@s-...> - 2007-02-15 16:48:48
|
Hi everybody, meanwhile I succeeded to install Rosegarden on an AMD64 system and it works great, ( as far as I tried it yet ) apart from the built in help that doesn't do anything. Now I tried to install it on my second system, an AMD i686 engine under SUSE Linux 10.1. I finally succeeded to solve all the dependency problems but one: "mad is needed by rosegarden4-1.2.4-0.jacklab.1.i586". I did not find a package for the i686, but this should not really be a problem ( hopefully ). I installed everything with KDE and everything "providing mad", but nothing solved my problem. Has anyone an idea, how to solve it? Thanks in advance Werner |
From: Nigel H. <cav...@al...> - 2007-02-15 17:44:05
|
On Saturday 10 February 2007 16:49, Werner Kupka wrote: > Hi everybody, > > meanwhile I succeeded to install Rosegarden on an AMD64 system and it works > great, > ( as far as I tried it yet ) apart from the built in help that doesn't do > anything. > Now I tried to install it on my second system, an AMD i686 engine under > SUSE Linux 10.1. I finally succeeded to solve all the dependency problems > but one: > "mad is needed by rosegarden4-1.2.4-0.jacklab.1.i586". I did not find a > package > for the i686, but this should not really be a problem ( hopefully ). I > installed > everything with KDE and everything "providing mad", but nothing solved my > problem. > Has anyone an idea, how to solve it? > > Thanks in advance > > Werner Look for the libmad package. Nigel. |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2007-02-15 17:55:21
|
On Saturday 10 Feb 2007 15:49, Werner Kupka wrote: > Now I tried to install it on my second system, an AMD i686 engine > under SUSE Linux 10.1. I finally succeeded to solve all the > dependency problems but one: > "mad is needed by rosegarden4-1.2.4-0.jacklab.1.i586". This dependency is actually wrong. The mad library is not needed or used by Rosegarden 1.2.4. It's an understandable mistake, as we used to have a test for libmad in the configure script used for building Rosegarden, thus giving the impression the library was required even though it in fact wasn't. Not that that helps you install your package. Rosegarden 1.2.4 is now two releases out of date, by the way. Also (while I'm being irritating), is it really true that SuSE still has no way to resolve these dependencies for you? Chris |