From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-06-03 12:42:07
|
We still haven't gotten around releasing 0.1.6. I can't think of anything= =20 crucial I'd like to put in before we do. What about you ? Two things that= =20 need fixing are the segments preview and the chord ruler. I'd rather fix = the=20 latter in priority, the previews being a new feature we can afford having= a=20 release with them not fully working yet. --=20 =09=09=09=09Guillaume =09=09=09=09http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2005-08-25 18:04:21
|
So, unless there are any pending issues, are we ready for a release ? -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Vladimir S. <vla...@vl...> - 2005-08-25 22:14:29
|
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:04:12 -0000, Guillaume Laurent <gla...@te...> wrote: > So, unless there are any pending issues, are we ready for a release ? > There's one issue which will not hold the release (I think) but is worth mentioning. It looks like Michael's filter selection isn't working anymore. :( I'm using it Michael! :) Vlada |
From: Silvan <dmm...@us...> - 2005-08-26 01:47:17
|
On Thursday 25 August 2005 02:04 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > So, unless there are any pending issues, are we ready for a release ? Since we never do point releases, we should wait for the Spanish docbook. It's only a couple three days away, theoretically. Speaking of which... Translations! We need to wait for everyone to update their translations. We need to sort that out and get everybody going. There are probably bugs to fix, such as the event filter thing Vlada just reported. That sort of thing should get shaken out in a proper pre-release run-up if we can get some actual *testing*. I don't think it would do to just make the final release today and run. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <dmm...@us...> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ |
From: Alexandre P. <ale...@gm...> - 2005-08-26 09:00:06
|
On 8/26/05, Silvan <dmm...@us...> wrote: > On Thursday 25 August 2005 02:04 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > So, unless there are any pending issues, are we ready for a release ? >=20 > Since we never do point releases, we should wait for the Spanish docbook. > It's only a couple three days away, theoretically. >=20 > Speaking of which... Translations! We need to wait for everyone to upda= te > their translations. We need to sort that out and get everybody going. Is plural forms patch committed? Alexandre |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2005-08-26 09:24:53
|
On Friday 26 August 2005 10:59, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > > Is plural forms patch committed? Er, which plural forms patch ? We know about the problem, but I haven't seen any fix yet. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Alexandre P. <ale...@gm...> - 2005-08-26 09:33:32
|
On 8/26/05, Guillaume Laurent <gla...@te...> wrote: > On Friday 26 August 2005 10:59, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > > > > Is plural forms patch committed? >=20 > Er, which plural forms patch ? We know about the problem, but I haven't s= een > any fix yet. Do you remember the large letter from Silvan several days ago? :) Alexandre |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2005-08-26 10:57:19
|
On Friday 26 August 2005 11:33, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > On 8/26/05, Guillaume Laurent <gla...@te...> wrote: > > On Friday 26 August 2005 10:59, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > > > Is plural forms patch committed? > > > > Er, which plural forms patch ? We know about the problem, but I haven't > > seen any fix yet. > > Do you remember the large letter from Silvan several days ago? :) Yes, but have you read it ? It doesn't contain a patch, just a grepped list of i18n messages, and he was asking (you, and other russian-speaking readers) which ones needed to be fixed. I haven't seen any replies to that yet, -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Alexandre P. <ale...@gm...> - 2005-08-26 11:15:27
|
On 8/26/05, Guillaume Laurent <gla...@te...> wrote: > > Do you remember the large letter from Silvan several days ago? :) >=20 > Yes, but have you read it ? It doesn't contain a patch, just a grepped li= st of > i18n messages, and he was asking (you, and other russian-speaking readers= ) > which ones needed to be fixed. I haven't seen any replies to that yet, Mmm, my bad. I will take a look at it ASAP Alexandre |
From: Silvan <dmm...@us...> - 2005-08-26 19:02:35
|
On Thursday 25 August 2005 02:04 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > So, unless there are any pending issues, are we ready for a release ? I'm rolling back the event filter to 1.0. I screwed something up when I abolished all the useless parts, and I have no idea when I'll have time or inclination to take a proper look at it. Fastest fix is just to revert. The recording preview thing seems OK now. I really need to sit down and actually put it through its paces before we release though. Probably should use it to do some little project, because things tend to appear in the course of real work that don't show up during a quick test thrash. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <dmm...@us...> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2005-09-15 06:45:23
|
On Thursday 25 August 2005 20:04, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > So, unless there are any pending issues, are we ready for a release ? The plural problem is patched (mostly - there are a couple of places where it will need some actual code redesign). I still have a pending bug dealing with session restoration which I hope to fix this w-e, but as far as I can tell we can at least get the ball rolling. I suggest we start producing some test tarballs, I can get one out tonight. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Stephen T. <st...@to...> - 2005-09-15 14:52:05
|
The guitar tab editor is ready for another review. In particular I am needing assistance on how to place the fretboard above the measure rather than below it. Stephen |
From: Richard B. <bo...@bo...> - 2002-06-03 16:31:37
|
Guillaume Laurent wrote: > We still haven't gotten around releasing 0.1.6. I can't think of anything > crucial I'd like to put in before we do. What about you ? No, not really. I'm kind of winding myself up to starting work again on RG this week so a release any time now is fine. R |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2002-06-03 17:12:13
|
Guillaume Laurent wrote: > Two things that > need fixing are the segments preview and the chord ruler. The latter is down to you, I suspect, as after my last couple of fixes it works fine for me and I haven't managed to reproduce your troubles. For the segment previews, I'm happy to release as is provided we ensure the default is for them not to appear. Chris |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-06-03 20:07:46
|
On Monday 03 June 2002 19:09, Chris Cannam wrote: > > The latter is down to you, I suspect, as after my last couple > of fixes it works fine for me and I haven't managed to reproduce > your troubles. I still can reproduce the vanishing chords problem I'm afraid. I'm looking at it now. BTW, all the more a reason to do a release is that we're mentionned on dot.kde.org again : http://dot.kde.org/1023085774/ -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-06-05 10:20:57
|
I don't think I'll have the time or energy to take care of the Chord rule= r pb=20 this week. Since it's not really a show-stopper, unless either of you obj= ects=20 I think we can release on friday. --=20 =09=09=09=09Guillaume =09=09=09=09http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-06-05 22:19:23
|
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 12:10, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > I don't think I'll have the time or energy to take care of the Chord ruler > pb this week. Since it's not really a show-stopper, unless either of you > objects I think we can release on friday. I've uploaded a test tarball on http://www.telegraph-road.org/rosegarden/rosegarden-0.1.6.tar.gz CVS isn't tagged yet. The admin_kde[23] directories were yet another interesting trick for make distrib. *sigh*. Ah well. So do you guys have the usual 'Changes' list ready ? Here's mine : - many bugs fixed - new matrix tool (note move, note duration change) - start of menu items state management - rework of the configuration system That's about it. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2002-06-06 08:56:49
|
Guillaume Laurent wrote: > The admin_kde[23] directories were yet another > interesting trick for make distrib. *sigh*. Hang on, weren't they in the last release? Bownie did that one, but he evidently coped okay. > usual 'Changes' list Um. - new quantize dialog in notation view - track name shown at start of staff in notation - matrix now shows time signature changes correctly - a few handy keyboard accelerators in notation view - a couple of new notation marks (marcato, staccatissimo) - first pass at Lilypond file export, courtesy of Hans Kieserman, and at Csound scorefile export - internal string usage should be unicode-clean throughout - many notation properties now view-local, ensuring better support for different layouts, sizes or smoothings in different views at the same time - first pass at previews of contents of segments on main view, though not yet optimised enough to be usable and of course - lots of bugs removed and replaced with new bugs I haven't tested the tarball yet. Chris |
From: Richard B. <bo...@bo...> - 2002-06-06 09:07:48
|
Guillaume Laurent wrote: > - many bugs fixed Do we need to actually state this? > - new matrix tool (note move, note duration change) > - start of menu items state management > - rework of the configuration system - experimental JACK audio driver with recording (not yet sync'd with ALSA output) - audio previews on Segments (but still no audio file insertion GUI) When we announce we should probably do so on linux-audio-announce as well as JACK development and as Chris said before link to our homepage and not the sf download page. I'm downloading the tarball at the moment. B |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-06-06 08:59:07
|
On Thursday 06 June 2002 10:56, Chris Cannam wrote: > Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > The admin_kde[23] directories were yet another > > interesting trick for make distrib. *sigh*. > > Hang on, weren't they in the last release? Bownie did that > one, but he evidently coped okay. No, we had admin and admin_kde3. Now we have admin being a symlink to eit= her=20 admin_kde2 or admin_kde3. Or perhaps it's just how I set things up over h= ere=20 and totally forgot about it. Mmh. --=20 =09=09=09=09Guillaume =09=09=09=09http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2002-06-06 09:17:40
|
Guillaume Laurent wrote: > No, we had admin and admin_kde3. Now we have admin being a symlink to either > admin_kde2 or admin_kde3. Or perhaps it's just how I set things up over here > and totally forgot about it. Mmh. Yep, I think that's the case -- judging from the fact that you seem to have packaged up an admin directory that's identical to the admin_kde3 one, so it's not possible to build with kde2. Also are you sure we really want cc_*_configure, rb_configure, gl_configure, seqscavenger.rb and update_docs* in the tarball? Chris |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-06-06 09:32:05
|
On Thursday 06 June 2002 11:17, Chris Cannam wrote: > > Yep, I think that's the case -- judging from the fact that you > seem to have packaged up an admin directory that's identical to > the admin_kde3 one, so it's not possible to build with kde2. But the admin_kde2 dir is still there, right ? > Also are you sure we really want cc_*_configure, rb_configure, > gl_configure, seqscavenger.rb and update_docs* in the tarball? No, but they've been there for ages... ah well, I'll change my tarball ma= king=20 script. --=20 =09=09=09=09Guillaume =09=09=09=09http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2002-06-06 09:38:14
|
Guillaume Laurent wrote: > But the admin_kde2 dir is still there, right ? Nope. You've got admin and admin_kde3, and they're the same. (The admin directory even says it's admin_kde3 in the CVS repository file.) No symlinks, no admin_kde2. Chris |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-06-06 09:43:03
|
On Thursday 06 June 2002 11:37, Chris Cannam wrote: > Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > But the admin_kde2 dir is still there, right ? > > Nope. You've got admin and admin_kde3, and they're the same. > (The admin directory even says it's admin_kde3 in the CVS > repository file.) No symlinks, no admin_kde2. *sigh*. I'll fix that and update a new tarball. Then again this directory= may=20 work with KDE2. --=20 =09=09=09=09Guillaume =09=09=09=09http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2002-06-06 09:46:05
|
Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Thursday 06 June 2002 11:37, Chris Cannam wrote: >>Guillaume Laurent wrote: >> >>>But the admin_kde2 dir is still there, right ? >> >>Nope. You've got admin and admin_kde3, and they're the same. >>(The admin directory even says it's admin_kde3 in the CVS >>repository file.) No symlinks, no admin_kde2. > > *sigh*. I'll fix that and update a new tarball. Then again this directory may > work with KDE2. Nope. Chris |