From: Chris Cannam <cannam@al...> - 2008-06-13 14:09:46
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Chris Cannam
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:55 PM, D. Michael McIntyre
> <michael.mcintyre@...> wrote:
>> Chris has begun some work on the port, but it isn't at all obvious to me what
> I've done nothing with it since I posted to the list about it on, um,
> the 20th of May.
All right, enough of the depressing stuff. Well, enough of _that_
depressing stuff. Let's have a different sort of depressing around
Here's a page about how we might attempt some of the routine
What I would really like would be if lots of developers piled in and
followed the suggestions in that page (and/or explained how to improve
that method) while I started work on one of the more major things
(probably "removing DCOP" first) in another branch.
If we actually did have more than one developer tackling this at once
(a pipe-dream I realise), then it would probably make sense to "pick a
library" (say, gui/rulers or commands/), notify the list upfront that
that's what you're working on, and work only on that.
If you would like to tackle one of the other major things that need
doing for Qt4, instead, please, say so. And see (and edit)
for more general notes.