Re: [Rosegarden-devel] more LoopRuler thoughts

[Richard B. <bo...@bo...>]

Chris Cannam wrote:

> What's your feeling on whether we'd be able to move the
> existing StaffRuler functionality (principally the editing
> cursor, which for various reasons I only half-remember is
> different from the playback cursor) into LoopRuler and then
> rename it to something generic that encompasses both uses?

I think first you'd better explain to me how the editing cursor
is supposed to work.

I'd certainly have no problem specialising LoopRuler to StaffRuler.
If we're going to re-use LoopRuler in notation, matrix etc. then 
should we really be having notation specific stuff in there - or
will it be useful to clients other than notation?

R