From: D. M. M. <mic...@ro...> - 2009-08-07 19:31:48
|
I hard coded an assortment of version numbers to sanity check whether the code would be able to resolve our new scheme. current: newest: pass: 1.7.3 10.02 y 10.02 10.04 y 10.04 11.12 y Nothing to worry about here. It also makes me realize I used the wrong scheme when I changed the version number, didn't I? It should have been 10.2 not 10.02. Two digits for the year, but only as many digits as required for the month. I'm pretty ambivalent about this, but I'll change it if anyone cares. -- D. Michael McIntyre |