From: Vince N. <vin...@gm...> - 2006-04-20 19:58:09
|
> > I'd forgotten how many > > nice features it had for pure MIDI sequencing - lots of tools to play > > with the note stream in real time (echo, counterpoint, modulate, > > deflam, etc) and the "quasi-staff" view option. > > I recall its "note pipeline" paradigm was highly regarded. Yes, that was the star feature. It felt more "organic," more like traditional plugging-things-together-with-cables than Cubase on the ST (another classic nevertheless) > > I was thinking of sitting down and going through it this weekend and > > building a list of ideas that might be useful for RG at some future > > time. > > That could be useful, but don't get too ambitious either :-). Don't worry, I'm not going to suggest embedding B&P as a virtual machine inside RG :-) The things I had particularly in mind were 1) Hybrid staff (a combination of piano-roll and notation staff - with some chaps looking at refactoring the staff view, this might be worth mentioning) 2) The various note manipulation tools, and if there are things there that are useful but not yet in RG. 3) Any sundry usability tips/tricks that pop out at me (use of numeric keypad for jumping to markers?) One thing that occurred to me as a result of seeing the "pipe tools" in B&P, but that isn't a B&P feature, was the idea of scriptable note manipulation. e.g.embedding Small or some similar highly sandboxed scripting engine, and having a simple API. For example, the script is called with a struct for each note in the segment (or midi track?), and it returns a list of note structs, with the restriction that it can't insert notes "in the past." The MIDI equivalent of a LADSPA plugin! (Ok, that's my next project after the guitar fingering sorted... ;) |