From: Vladimir S. <vl...@ro...> - 2004-03-03 19:27:23
|
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:21:28 GMT, William <ros...@li...> wrote: > Chris Cannam <ca...@al...> wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 03 Mar 2004 2:53 pm, Vladimir Savic wrote: >>> My tcsh shell complaint about this one... >> >> It's Bourne shell syntax. I can't remember the C-shell equivalent, >> but you could just run it from bash. > > Just to clarify what Chris said, you can run it from tcsh using a bash > subshell: > % sh -c "rosegarden --nofork --nosequencer > /tmp/trace 2>&1" > > or else run it directly in tcsh using tcsh syntax: > % rosegarden --nofork --nosequencer >& /tmp/trace Here it is: Profiler : id = RosegardenGUIDoc::syncDevices - elapsed = 0ms CPU, 0.000016000R real RosegardenGUIDoc::xmlParse (reader.parse()): 20ms elapsed Profiler : id = RosegardenGUIDoc::syncDevices - elapsed = 0ms CPU, 0.000008000R real Profiles::dump() : -> RosegardenGUIDoc::syncDevices: CPU: 2 calls, 0ms, 0us/call -> RosegardenGUIDoc::syncDevices: real: 2 calls, 0.000024000R, 0.000012000R/call Profiles::dump() finished This is definitely everything that rg have said. I think you were right G. But, sf is loaded.. Thanx William and Guillaume :)) I'm linux user for about.. half of year!! :(( So, sorry abut stupid questions :)) Vladimir > William > -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ |