From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2003-10-06 12:52:14
|
On Monday 06 Oct 2003 12:48 pm, Richard Bown wrote: > Can't we just map tempo and timesig changes (or say "current" and > "next") in the ControlBlock? That wouldn't need to be updated > continuously just when a tempo or timesig changes. Well, either you store the whole tempo map or else you have to go back=20 to the GUI to ask for more at some point. Current and next could work as a tolerable hack if we were confident=20 we weren't going to get tempo changes really frequently, but I'm not=20 sure I'd want to bet on that particularly if they were generated in=20 some continuous way. Better than nothing, but it might be just as=20 easy to store the whole lot. Chris |