From: Rainer Schöpf <rainer.schoepf@gm...>  20120525 08:47:08

On Fri, 25 May 2012, Michael Borcherds wrote: > Thanks for the fast answer! That's a good improvement for eg x^4 > > It doesn't affect eg (x+1)^3 or x^n  any way to improve those too? Are you sure you are using a recent version of Reduce? As my last mail showed, x^n behaves like you want. As for (x+1)^3, the integrator expands the polynomial before performing the integration. I don't see a way around this. Note that this gives a result with constant term equal to zero. Rainer 