#138 Czech qwertz keymap correction

v1.8.2
closed-fixed
nobody
keyboard (31)
5
2014-05-21
2007-05-25
Jaroslav Jiricka
No

I have created a new keymap for czech standard (QWERTZ) keyboard layout (cs, 0x405).

The original "cs" keymap found in rdesktop 1.5 and in CVS, contributed by Lukas Kubin (#1100305), is uncomplete and has several problems which make it unusable, such as remapping the small letter e to EuroSign, as reported in rdesktop bug #1375353 or recently at http://www.abclinuxu.cz/forum/show/181220 (in czech).

The attached keymap has been tested and seems to work for all charecters found on the czech QWERTZ keyboard in Windows.

Discussion

1 2 > >> (Page 1 of 2)
  • Czech keymap

     
    Attachments
    cs
  • Logged In: YES
    user_id=1801521
    Originator: YES

    File Added: cs

     
    • labels: --> keyboard
     
  • Logged In: YES
    user_id=1801521
    Originator: YES

    Added file named "additional" with some definitions of compose sequences for latin-2 characters. These migth come in handy when switching between two Central European keyboard layouts, such as Czech and Slovak. It is included from within my "cs" keymap, but might be eventually merged into the "common" file.
    File Added: additional

     
  • Additional sequences

     
    Attachments
  • Logged In: YES
    user_id=1801521
    Originator: YES

    Added a new Slovak keymap -- "sk". (The Czech keymap is already usable for Slovak language, but this one puts "SK" letters into the Windows language bar ;)
    File Added: sk

     
  • Slovak keymap

     
    Attachments
    sk
  • Dusan Hokuv
    Dusan Hokuv
    2011-06-23

    Is any progress to apply suplied very simple patch?

     
  • Peter Åstrand
    Peter Åstrand
    2011-08-16

    I'm not convinced about the merits of the "additional" file. I think that sequences that are truly common should be added to the "common" file. For other sequences which are only relevant, say, for slavic languages, could be added to a new file, but it should probably have a better name than "additional" in that case.

    Also, note that there is already a "cs" file. I'd like to have some indication whether this new cs file is better than the old one. The optimal approach is to submit small patches which fixes one problem at a time, rather than replace the entire file.

     
1 2 > >> (Page 1 of 2)