From: Jukka M. <jm...@py...> - 2003-02-13 07:03:16
|
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 05:18:03PM -0500, Brian Tao wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Jay Sorg wrote: > > > > > Maybe I'll try to capture port 3389 traffic and see if there is a > > > significant difference in amount or response time between packets. > > > > That would be helpfull. > > > > Also, try the latest cvs version, there was some test draw > > optimizations after 1.2b1 was made. Just to make sure thats not the > > issue. > > The 1.2.0 release appears to have fixed the screen update > performance issues for me. I did capture network traces when running > the 1.0.0 client (which was fast) and the 1.2b1 client (which was > slow)... no discernable differences there in size or volume of > packets. Anyway, it looks like the problem has been fixed with 1.2.0. Well, I just tried the -current version and it felt noticeably slower than the version I'm usually running (built 29 Nov 2002), even when using 256 colors. It's not unusable, just slower than before - so for now, I'm sticking to the older version. I use rdesktop on a NetBSD 1.6 system and start it with rdesktop -k sv -g 1274x996 host -jm |