From: Duncan F. <du...@de...> - 2003-04-20 16:55:13
|
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 07:43:14AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote: > But - getting to my point. If we can create a dynamic list of target=20 > sites based on the URLs within the spam, so that if spam links to our=20 > pulls images from the prohibited sites, that this would be an effective= =20 > tool for identifying spam. In fact - in the case where the affiliate ID= =20 > is embedded in the link, there is a means to create an automatic=20 > complaint system to notify the target site that spicific affiliates are= =20 > spamming to get hits. >=20 > Anyhow - for Spamassassin I'm thinking about the idea of both system=20 > maintained and user maintained black lists based on links alone. For=20 > Razor I'm thinking about a message fingerprinting system bases in links= =20 > alone. Many spmammers like to spamvertise sites that are entirely legit in an attempt to discredit the company. (like spamcop.net) If we did this, I would bet that spammers would start adding links to http://www.spamassassin.org, and others. Too much abuse, I say. --=20 Duncan Findlay |