From: Theo V. D. <fel...@kl...> - 2003-02-28 20:11:57
|
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:58:10PM -0600, Jason Borgmann wrote: > I have tried to get Marc to send me a copy of EFFector but he seems to > refuse. I wanted to see what the cf rating was on it. Well, if I check right now, the last 4 (starting with the most recent): mail 1.0 e=3D2 sig=3D4vSKtqmPMPqAYSwRu0TrkQrEQkMA: sig not found. mail 1.0 e=3D4 sig=3DCrlz4n-5gQU9-rDJG3398OxySpcA: sig not found. method 4: mail 1.0: contention part, skipping method 4: mail 1: all non-contention parts not spam, mail not spam mail 1 is not known spam. mail 1.0 e=3D2 sig=3DE-3ugrwbTYB-SIVna83NI9bKlLAA: sig not found. mail 1.0 e=3D4 sig=3DYFwlvQ-sGdVO_cRVt09FfiqQSoEA: sig not found. method 4: mail 1.0: contention part, skipping method 4: mail 1: all non-contention parts not spam, mail not spam mail 1 is not known spam. mail 1.0 e=3D2 sig=3DL5lt_Ya8DcI8zS1JAes3GS0mR8kA: sig not found. mail 1.0 e=3D4 sig=3DzS60CQm-WTNgIyx9WAjdHSWiT5EA: Is spam: cf 28 >=3D min_= cf 6 method 4: mail 1.0: no-contention part, spam=3D1 method 4: mail 1: a non-contention part was spam, mail spam mail 1 is known spam. mail 1.0 e=3D2 sig=3D-pBVkZKu_umFP7eCMzw63b1rny4A: sig not found. mail 1.0 e=3D4 sig=3DGQAubIDLNV8gKp9SnFToxe_Uj_YA: sig not found. method 4: mail 1.0: contention part, skipping method 4: mail 1: all non-contention parts not spam, mail not spam mail 1 is not known spam. This of course is meaningless since it's what the cf level was when it came in. I can only tell you what I had for SpamAssassin matches: RAZOR2_CHECK,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_01_10 # RAZOR2_CHECK says cf>=3Dmin_cf, so cf = >=3D 6 none none none So it looks like for the last 4 newsletters to me, only one was hit by Razor when it arrived at my mail server. Since they were received, all have been reported to Razor, and 3 of the 4 were properly revoked. --=20 Randomly Generated Tagline: "... so people can't look up your skirt I guess... Not that I wear one..." - Prof. Brown about "Modesty Skirts". |