Did you see the latest news?  Whidbey now is reported to be delayed until Mid-2005.  I don't think anyone wants to wait that long for some of its features.  Especially if we can code for .NET 1.1 so that things will easily migrate.
Cory Isakson
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Elebash
To: John M ; rainbowportal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 9:02 AM
Subject: RE: [Rainbowportal-devel] Interested in opinions of this article

This is just my opinion, but if we decide to use .Net 2.0 for V2 the features and architecture of .Net 2.0 are different enough that I don’t think we should try to support net1.1.  Much of the core of rainbow’s functionality is already included out of the box in Whidbey.


From: rainbowportal-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:rainbowportal-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of John M
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:51 AM
To: rainbowportal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Rainbowportal-devel] Interested in opinions of this article


Hi guys,


If vnext will support net1.1 as well I'd like to know whether people think this is a good way of supporting an easy migration path to Whidbey.




About Personalisation.



Stay in touch better and keep protected online with MSN’s NEW all-in-one Premium Services. Find out more here.

------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Rainbowportal-devel mailing list Rainbowportal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rainbowportal-devel