Hello,
To me, git, like it is used with csound, seems comfortable. Once it is done once, you can always update with
pull csoundqt ( or whatever it becomes)
And that's it!
I think using svn from the user's side is more difficult.
tarmo

teisipäev, 11. oktoober 2011 Andres Cabrera <mantaraya36@gmail.com> kirjutas:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> This change will only affect developers. Users will see no difference.
>
> Cheers,
> Andres
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Rainer.Boesch-i
> <rainer.boesch@laposte.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 10, 2011, at 18:39 , Andres Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> I'm thinking of moving CsoundQt development to git in the near future,
>>> possibly after the next upcoming release.
>>
>>
>> what is "git"?
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
>> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
>> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
>> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qutecsound-users mailing list
>> Qutecsound-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qutecsound-users
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
> _______________________________________________
> Qutecsound-users mailing list
> Qutecsound-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qutecsound-users
>