From: Eric <eriic1@co...>  20111004 03:58:12

On 10/03/2011 06:04 AM, Sam Fentress wrote: >> I am new at using QUCS so this may not be the answer you are looking >> for. I tried your circuit using the default values for the AC source >> and capacitor. QUCS was having a hard time computing the simulation and >> it may be because of the frequency of the AC source or the number of >> calculations required. I adjusted the values of the AC source to have a >> frequency of 1.0 MHz and changed the capacitor to a value of 1 nF and >> gave the Transient Analysis a stop time of 1 ms. When I plot the >> output I use a Cartesian graph graphing Vin.Vt and Vout.Vt. The graph >> gives good results. If this works, you can play around with the values >> to see how QUCS is working and hopefully get what you are looking for. >> >> Hope this helps you, >> >> Eric >> >> > Hi Eric, > > Yes, that works! Boy, do I feel silly. I hadn't thought about the fact that > the default settings for the power source was set at 1 GHz, and that this > would be very timeconsuming to simulate... > > With the AC power frequency dropped all the way down to 60 Hz, this > simulation returned almost instantly. > > Thank you! > > Sam >  > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunkd2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Qucshelp mailing list > Qucshelp@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qucshelp > Your welcome, I am glad I could help. Eric 