Re: [Quantlib-users] MersenneTwisterUniformRng .. now correct

[Luigi B. <lui...@fa...>]

Hi Michael,

On 2004.10.29 16:46, mdi...@gm... wrote:
>=20
> I am intersted in the rational for chosing the implementation of
> MersenneTwisterUniformRng with "Size mti" being static. This choice
> leads to different random sequences for the cases sketched below.
> My prefered behavior would result when "Size mti" was _mutable_. But =20
> there probably is a good reason for not doing so.

Not that I know of---and I, too, think mutable would give the least =20
surprising behavior. If nobody objects, I'm going to change it before next =
=20
release.

Later,
	Luigi