slave_to_master_delay versus delaySM?

2011-07-30
2012-11-23
  • William Welch
    William Welch
    2011-07-30

    In the routine updateDelay, I notice a local variable named slave_to_master_delay is calculated and used with maxDelay, but is never stored.  Instead, the delaySM seems to be used thereafter.  I'm not sure if this is a bug or just some old code that isn't important.  please advise.

    thank you,
    William

     
  • William Welch
    William Welch
    2011-07-30

    Sorry, I should have mentioned I am in the v2 branch, rev 138

     
  • Sorry to take so long.  The variable is used to effect a local check and if that check fails then delaySM is not updated.  Basically it protects delaySM in certain error cases.  This is not a bug.