From: stephan b. <st...@s1...> - 2006-09-21 16:30:57
|
On Thursday 21 September 2006 14:30, Aloysius Indrayanto wrote: > Or, like I said in my previous e-mail, it maybe better to make all > methods including at() to accept (x,y) and rename the operator [] to > scanline() which accept the y coordinate and returns the appropriate > image row? > > Think all people understand that scanline is a row thus it will > always want y. That sounds like a very good compromise to me. =2D-=20 =2D---- st...@s1... http://s11n.net "...pleasure is a grace and is not obedient to the commands of the will." -- Alan W. Watts |