From: Alan S. <at...@ac...> - 2002-12-19 13:38:46
|
Dav...@t-... (David Kastrup) writes: > For our autoconf/configure specialists: is there a reason why > configure does not visually barf on unknown options? Yep, it's not supposed to. 8^( (autoconf)Working With External Software `configure' scripts do not complain about `--with-PACKAGE' options that they do not support. This behavior permits configuring a source tree containing multiple packages with a top-level `configure' script when the packages support different options, without spurious error messages about options that some of the packages support. An unfortunate side effect is that option spelling errors are not diagnosed. No better approach to this problem has been suggested so far. I don't know any way to change this without deep (and subject to breakage) hackery. -- Alan Shutko <at...@ac...> - In a variety of flavors! Famous Last Words #08: "Brak? That's a stupid name for a barbarian." |