From: Fred L. <ff...@ab...> - 2006-03-02 08:38:12
|
On Wednesday 01 Mar 2006 21:03, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote: > Heya, > > ff...@ab... wrote: > >On the other hand, > >it seems that we might have to upgrade anyway because of problems related > >to the camera interface and javaClient. > > Can you elaborate please ? I thought I fixed the camera already in > 1.6.5's CVS. I'm not sure yet. One of my students is having problems accessing data from the camera using the javaClient and I have seen in archives on its mailing list that there is a bug in the version (of javaClient) we are using and that it is fixed in version 2. So I don't know yet if the problems are on player's side or javaClient's side, although there is evidence for the latter (http://www.nabble.com/More-JavaClient-camera-woes-t1074571.html#a2820150). And I tend to stay away from CVS (not just javaClient's) because I need something stable that will work so that students (and myself) don't loose too much time with that. > > >Could you please advise on the amount of work involved in modifying > >existing code to make it work with player-2? > > Are we talking Javaclient-wise here? Both. I have seen the page on player's differences, but reading it quickly yesterday left me with the feeling that it was mostly intended for much lower level programmers than we are. I'll give it a try on another machine using player and stage to have some idea. > If so, I will port the examples and > prepare an e-mail with the differences between 1.6.5 and 2.0 from a Java > POV soon. That would be great. Thanks. Fred |