On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Brian Gerkey <email@example.com>
Great. I checked them into SVN.
On Oct 20, 2008, at 11:58 AM, Alberto Valero wrote:
>> The robot_params work properly for the PatrolBot!!
You could give an invalid range, such as 0.0, or even -1.0.
>> The sicklms200 driver doesn't support an "ignore" parameter, but it
>> could be added. We'd happily accept a patch that adds this
> The only problem is what range should the driver write on the ignored
> rays!, we have added in our client the interpolation between the
> values of the ignored rays, would this fit everybody??
Clients would have to be coded to ignore such readings (which is easy