My main reservation about trac is that it has poor support for bugs that exist in multiple versions, multiple OS's etc. I have used trac a lot in the past and it is great for simple projects, but it may not be able to support player as it moves forward in maturity. Also, less importantly trac doesn't support CVS, but we are plannign to move player to svn at some stage anyway.

Thanks for the link, I will have a proper look over the options once player 2.1-RC1 is out and start off some more discussion.

Toby

On 01/10/2007, Jordi <mumismo@gmail.com> wrote:

Some time ago there was in this list some discussion about what bug tracking system to use.

Here is a comparison of almost everything :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue_tracking_systems

I personally would choose trac.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Playerstage-developers mailing list
Playerstage-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/playerstage-developers




--
This email is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged and/or confidential information