From: Lawrence Akka <Lawrence_A<kka@th...> - 2002-02-02 09:17:50
I wondered where you'd got to!
I haven't yet implemented the CacheExecute facility of ADODB - I will
probably have a go at it this weekend.
There are still a few other performance enhancements I could make.
What I have done so far is really a proof of concept only.
> AODB was up to twice as fast, and subsequent reloads of
> AllPages seemed
> quicker. (Is that possible--does it have better cacheing or
> Mac OS X 10.1.2, mysql-3.23.44, php 4.1, Apache/1.3.22.
> We're talking about less than a quarter of one second of improvment
> loading AllPages on my system, but it does seem (barely)
> noticeably faster.
> I wonder what the speed difference would be like on the SourceForge
In some tests I done ADODB is three times faster than PEAR. I can
this test to any who like.
And yes ADODB can have a cache system, but I guess that Lawrence
throw this yet to the CVS, so expect more improvement when this
system is committed. Am I right Lawerence? Didi you put yet the
Anyway, ADODB is technically better done than PEAR, and supports
Right decision Lawrence! Congrats!
Pablo Roca MS - VFP MVP
La Coru=F1a - Espa=F1a
Phpwiki-talk mailing list
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential. It is for the
use of the named recipient only. If you are not the named recipient,
please destroy and do not disclose the contents of this e-mail
to any other person, or copy it. Thank you for your co-operation.