From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-03-02 12:59:56
|
Micki Kaufman schrieb: > Was wondering if you'd had a chance to bulletproof 'IncludeSiteMap' yet. I'm just fighting with the culprit extractSection(). Some other plugins use that also. PS: from this wednesday on I am on a film festival for one week. So I will have not much time there. > Thanks so much for bringing it into the code base - it's so close to > being complete! > Micki > >> Reini's rewrite of IncludeSiteMap looks great, but needs a bit more >> bugproofing. >> >> Right now, it appears not to load the included pages on the second >> page load. In addition, it's unclear how to bypass the reclimit and >> includepages defaults, to allow inclusion of a page's full content and >> modify the depth of recursion. >> >> Anyone else using IncludeSiteMap - can you verify? >> >> Thanks! >> Micki >> >>> Hi Reini. Testing my migrated wiki in my test environment - 1.3.8 >>> looks good! >>> >>> One question with my tests re: 'IncludeSiteMap' - For document >>> chunking (Single-source), we need full, quiet includes as in the >>> original. >>> >>> Currently, it's defaulted to 50 words, and I can't seem to make a >>> change by editing the IncludeSiteMap source. If you have a moment, do >>> you mind helping me figure out how can I accomplish this? -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |