Re: [phpslash-users] RE : The Road to 0.65 : File Extension, php3, php or... ?

[Joe S. <jo...@be...>]

Anybody clear up what's the problem with putting the filename in the
template rather than coder?  In most of these,  they are referring to
another script, so it has to be either in the code or the template.
Seems more flexible in the template to me...


Joe

On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 08:46:18PM -0500, nathan r. hruby wrote:
> 
> > > How does this affect .tpl files though?  There's no php code in them, they
> > > are parsed internally to phpSlash, an untouched .tpl should never even
> > > reach a user agent and as far as the webserver is concerned it never
> > > actually sends a .tpl file.. it doesn't need to know about them.
> > 
> > It seems like there is still some hardcoded strings here and there,
> > I found the string ".php3" in the following files :
> > 
> > mailinglistadmin.tpl
> > backendRSS91.tpl
> > pollMoreLink.tpl
> > header.tpl (is this one really used?)
> > pollList.tpl
> > queryblock.tpl
> > sectionsblock.tpl
> > story.tpl
> > storyIndex.tpl
> > storyRelated.tpl
> > submission.tpl
> > topicsblock.tpl
> > 
> > 
> 
> File a seperate bug for this as well please and it shall be quashed
> 
> -n
> 
> -- 
> ........
> nathan hruby
> Webmaster: UGA Department of Drama and Theatre
> Project Maintainer: phpSlash, Carousel
> nh...@ar...
> ........
>