[Pcgen-trackers_Data] [ pcgen-Data Bugs-1763290 ] [SRD] Bad Weapon Proficiency references

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Data Bugs item #1763290, was opened at 2007-07-30 01:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by frank_kliewe
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1763290&group_id=25576

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Weapon Proficiencies List File Incorrect Information
Group: For 5.12
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Tom Parker (thpr)
>Assigned to: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith)
Summary: [SRD] Bad Weapon Proficiency references

Initial Comment:

Race: Ettin AUTO contains WeaponProf: Club (Great), which doesn't exist (as a Weapon Prof or as Equipment)

Race: Centaur AUTO grants WeaponProf: Lance (Heavy), yet Lance (Heavy) uses proficiency Lance ... so there is no WeaponProf Lance (Heavy)

Feat: Shadowdancer Weapon Proficiencies AUTO grants WeaponProf: Mace (Light), yet Mace (Light) uses proficiency Mace ... so there is no WeaponProf Mace (Light)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe)
Date: 2007-07-30 05:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1241568
Originator: NO

Hm. Technically we need that split proficiency to set up the proficiencies
of the rogue. I think a base class weighs in more heavy than a prestige
class like the Shadowdancer, so I agree we should go with splitting the
proficiency.

But let's not introduce such a change in proficiencies in the 5.12.1
update, which should largely be identical in behaviour to 5.12.0. Better
split off a tracker for the mace to be corrected for 5.14 and make the
change to trunk only.

-- Frank

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith)
Date: 2007-07-30 03:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=208239
Originator: NO

Ok, all but the Mace thing fixed in both Trunk and branch_5.12.x

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith)
Date: 2007-07-30 03:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=208239
Originator: NO

Should be Greatclub, not Club (Great).  Fixing that one next.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith)
Date: 2007-07-30 03:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=208239
Originator: NO

Frank, I need a comment here.  I think we should go with two Mace
proficiencies in the SRD (based on prof. stuff in Rogue class).  But this
argument has gone around a few times.  The other side of the argument is
one proficiency, based on proficiency list from Shadowdancer.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith)
Date: 2007-07-30 03:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=208239
Originator: NO

Goddess, the Mace v. Mace (Light/Heavy) thing again.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1763290&group_id=25576