From: Jim W. <jwa...@ph...> - 2005-11-09 05:51:07
|
I have merged in the changes for the optimizer and a few other small things. I updated the version file to 2.7.0.12 I still want to track down why it is crashing sometimes for some people before I releasing a Windows binary. Bruno Postle wrote: >There is a new bug in adjust.c that messes-up PTOptimizer with 2.7.0.11. > >It can be fixed by reverting that file or just using 2.7.0.10. > >Once a real fix has been applied, expect 2.7.0.12 soon after that. > -- Jim Watters Graphic Software Developer http://photocreations.ca |
From: Pablo d'A. <pab...@we...> - 2005-11-09 07:32:50
Attachments:
libpano-amd64-speedup.patch
|
Jim Watters schrieb: > I have merged in the changes for the optimizer and a few other small > things. I updated the version file to 2.7.0.12 Please apply the patch for math.c I have posted a few days earlier. libpano12 is quite unuseable for bigger projects on many AMD64 linux system without it. Thanks, Pablo |
From: Jim W. <jwa...@ph...> - 2005-11-09 12:06:25
|
8 hours later and none of the changes are in the CVS. I just tried again, and got an error. cvs update: warning: unrecognized response `Remote process exit code unavailable ' from cvs server cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) Error, CVS operation failed Will try to upload again in about 12 hours. Jim Jim Watters wrote: > I have merged in the changes for the optimizer and a few other small > things. I updated the version file to 2.7.0.12 > I still want to track down why it is crashing sometimes for some > people before I releasing a Windows binary. > > Bruno Postle wrote: > >> There is a new bug in adjust.c that messes-up PTOptimizer with 2.7.0.11. >> >> It can be fixed by reverting that file or just using 2.7.0.10. >> >> Once a real fix has been applied, expect 2.7.0.12 soon after that. > |
From: Bruno P. <br...@po...> - 2005-11-09 13:04:26
|
On Wed 09-Nov-2005 at 00:51 -0500, Jim Watters wrote: > I still want to track down why it is crashing sometimes for some people > before I releasing a Windows binary. There were lots of changes to tiff.c between 2.7.0.9 and 2.7.0.10: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/panotools/libpano/tiff.c?r1=1.3%3Arelease-2-7-0-9&tr1=1.1&r2=1.5%3Arelease-2-7-0-10&tr2=1.7&diff_format=h ..or do you think it is a problem with libtiff or the compiler you are using? -- Bruno |