From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-18 14:09:52
|
Bugs item #611107, was opened at 2002-09-18 10:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=611107&group_id=16191 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Cohen (wcohen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sample file naming with separate samples Initial Comment: The current cvs version of oprofiled run with "--separate-samples=1" is screwing up the file names for the samples; it is repeating the application name in the file name. For example: }usr}sbin}sshd}}}usr}sbin}sshd#0 }usr}sbin}sshd}}}usr}sbin}sshd#2 Shouldn't these be the following? }usr}sbin}sshd#0 }usr}sbin}sshd#2 -Will ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=611107&group_id=16191 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-18 15:12:32
|
Bugs item #611107, was opened at 2002-09-18 10:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=611107&group_id=16191 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Cohen (wcohen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sample file naming with separate samples Initial Comment: The current cvs version of oprofiled run with "--separate-samples=1" is screwing up the file names for the samples; it is repeating the application name in the file name. For example: }usr}sbin}sshd}}}usr}sbin}sshd#0 }usr}sbin}sshd}}}usr}sbin}sshd#2 Shouldn't these be the following? }usr}sbin}sshd#0 }usr}sbin}sshd#2 -Will ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: William Cohen (wcohen) Date: 2002-09-18 11:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=542804 How about this change to op_mangle_filename()? 2002-09-18 Will Cohen <wc...@re...> *libop/op_mangle.c (op_mangle_filename): Correct logic for generating mangled name. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=611107&group_id=16191 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-18 18:17:02
|
Bugs item #611107, was opened at 2002-09-18 16:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=611107&group_id=16191 Category: None Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Cohen (wcohen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sample file naming with separate samples Initial Comment: The current cvs version of oprofiled run with "--separate-samples=1" is screwing up the file names for the samples; it is repeating the application name in the file name. For example: }usr}sbin}sshd}}}usr}sbin}sshd#0 }usr}sbin}sshd}}}usr}sbin}sshd#2 Shouldn't these be the following? }usr}sbin}sshd#0 }usr}sbin}sshd#2 -Will ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Philippe Elie (phil_e) Date: 2002-09-18 20:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=318973 Ok, thanks for the quick fix, I'll apply it with a minor reformating. This bug come from recent change to dae app_name crappy stuff. Bug entry assigned to Will. regards, Phil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Cohen (wcohen) Date: 2002-09-18 17:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=542804 How about this change to op_mangle_filename()? 2002-09-18 Will Cohen <wc...@re...> *libop/op_mangle.c (op_mangle_filename): Correct logic for generating mangled name. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=611107&group_id=16191 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-11-06 18:55:29
|
Bugs item #611107, was opened at 2002-09-18 14:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=611107&group_id=16191 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Cohen (wcohen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sample file naming with separate samples Initial Comment: The current cvs version of oprofiled run with "--separate-samples=1" is screwing up the file names for the samples; it is repeating the application name in the file name. For example: }usr}sbin}sshd}}}usr}sbin}sshd#0 }usr}sbin}sshd}}}usr}sbin}sshd#2 Shouldn't these be the following? }usr}sbin}sshd#0 }usr}sbin}sshd#2 -Will ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philippe Elie (phil_e) Date: 2002-09-18 18:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=318973 Ok, thanks for the quick fix, I'll apply it with a minor reformating. This bug come from recent change to dae app_name crappy stuff. Bug entry assigned to Will. regards, Phil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Cohen (wcohen) Date: 2002-09-18 15:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=542804 How about this change to op_mangle_filename()? 2002-09-18 Will Cohen <wc...@re...> *libop/op_mangle.c (op_mangle_filename): Correct logic for generating mangled name. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=611107&group_id=16191 |