Re: Changed binary bug

[John L. <mo...@co...>]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 06:30:07AM +0200, Philippe Elie wrote:

> > If it's out of date, we should delete the current sample file altogether and start
> 
> delete or rename ?

delete, since we can't do anything useful with it in all likelihood.

> > you think so ? like what ?
> 
> mapping->hash is an uid (because it is the hash entry in the dname components
> path). This mean than search in the image stuff in the daemon can use it as
> search criteria. Rebuilding the path name in the daemon is necessary only if the
> search for the image fail. Just need to add an u16 uid_hash in opd_image.

heh, you read my mind. I thought of this a couple of weeks ago, and was quite astonished
I /wasn't/ already doing it ;)

regards
john

-- 
"Since when would the sizeof any kind of pointer be zero ? 
 Have you built a zero-bit CPU ?"
	- Jeffrey Turner