From: John Levon <levon@mo...> - 2004-09-27 20:23:55
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:48:04PM -0600, Jimmy DeWitt wrote:
> We will post our three proposals as separate threads.
Thanks for writing this stuff up.
I'm not sure this is the best naming but we can work through these
> Possible options for oprofiled:
> 1) Maintain samples as offsets. Minimal post processing modifications.
> - Create an "elf" or map-like file itself or require that one be
> 2) Maintain samples as VMAs and let the post processing sort it out.
> 3) Interface with oprofiled, producing an anonymous address database
> - This work could be in oprofiled or a shared library which the
> could register address to name, offset and other information and
> the daemon could
> query from it to translate the VMA to an offset.
As you know, 1) is my favourite here. I've commented in proposal 1's