false value in Memory Amount

Help
Pit
2008-02-08
2013-04-08
  • Pit
    Pit
    2008-02-08

    COSBI OSMark Version 1.0beta8 - VIA Edition
    Date: 08.02.2008 21:23:46
    * CPU Name: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz (Intel P4-Prescott 3215MHz)
    * Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
    * Core ID: Family: 15, Model: 3, Stepping: 3
    * Number of CPUs (real, virtual): 1, 2
    * CPU Features: trace L1 cache, 12 K microOPs, 8 ways; L1d (kB): 0; L2 (kB): 1024; FPU; CX8; APIC; CMOV; PAE; PAT; MMX; SSE; SSE2; SSE3; HyperThreading
    * Windows MHz: 3215
    * COSBI CPU Clock speed is 3.215.464.090 Hz
    * CPU External Clock: 200 MHz
    * Motherboard: GBT___, Model AWRDACPI
    * BIOS: Award Modular BIOS v6.00PG, Version: GBT    - 42302e31
    * Graphics adapter: RADEON 9800 SERIES
    * Graphics adapter memory: 128 MB
    * Graphics driver: 7.01.01.680
    * Memory Amount (MB): 2048 <--- THIS SHOULD BE 3070
    * Hard drive model: SAMSUNG SP1614C ATA Device, Size: 160,0 GB
    * Screen Resolution: 1280x1024x32@75Hz
    * OS Name: Windows Vista (TM) Ultimate
    * Version: 6.0
    * Build: 6000
    * Service Pack:
    * Registered Owner: root
    * Registered Organization:

    Maybe a bug?

     
    • Van Smith
      Van Smith
      2008-04-22

      I read most of the system information including amount of memory from WMI, so if OpenSourceMark is reporting only 2GBs, then Windows believes it only has 2GB.

      Van

       
    • JAU
      JAU
      2009-01-12

      Hi Van.

      I just tried out OpenSourceMark on a Win2k3 SE machine.  The Windows OS sees 16GBs of RAM, but OSMark only reports 2048MBs. 

      Also, when I try using Result Viewer, the system I just tested doesn't show up.  The only graph that shows up is the one for "Intel Intel Core 2 CPU  6600 @ 2.40GHz 2394MHz 1,170".  I was expecting to see my machine's results after running a single iteration of the full test and then clicking on the "view results" button.

      ...and the help button doesn't work.

      I'm assuming you know about these issues.  I just spent some of my time trying to use OSMark for a report.  I had to give up after realizing I can't spend my time trying to figure the application out.

      For future reference, are you planning to update OSMark?  I used your older version before and liked the product. 

      julio

       
  • Van Smith
    Van Smith
    2009-12-09

    Hi Julio,

    Wow, there are lots of comments to catch up with.  I didn't expect the activity, but am glad to see it.

    I have not tested OpenSourceMark much on 64-bit operating systems, so I assume these problems are specific to them.  I'll take a look.

    Thanks for the feedback,

    Van