From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-07-16 20:03:46
|
Feature Requests item #3368252, was opened at 2011-07-15 19:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sd-snatcher You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=421864&aid=3368252&group_id=38274 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: MSX devices support Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: FRS (sd-snatcher) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fast!DiskROM Initial Comment: Please add the device Fast!DiskROM to openMSX. The configuration file is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: FRS (sd-snatcher) Date: 2011-07-16 17:03 Message: > It has a different name and has a different sha1sum. Now, which one to > add? And why is the sha1sum different anyway? Those are two versions, one for the CDX2 interface and other for the DDX-3.0 interface. The difference is that the DDX-3.0 is a more advanced interface, and supports both I/O through ports and memory. It's BIOS always uses the memory I/O, so more than one interface can be connected to the same MSX. I'm not sure if openMSX already supports the DDX-3.0 interface, this is why I sent the CDX2 Fast!DiskROM too. It's up to you to choose each one will be available. The CDX2 is certainly the easiest one. About the "0 drives" problem, it seems to be a bug on openMSX FDC emulation. On real hardware that doesn't happen and the drives are correctly detected regardless of a presence of a floppydisk inside. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Manuel Bilderbeek (manuelbi) Date: 2011-07-16 08:10 Message: Another issue: in openMSX, when starting up with this extension, I see "0 drives" reported (both physical and logical). And when inserting a disk, it keeps saying "Disk offline". However, when starting up with a disk inserted, drives are detected and everything runs fine. Is this normal? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Manuel Bilderbeek (manuelbi) Date: 2011-07-16 07:43 Message: Just one question: in the past you sent me a config like this: <msxconfig> <info> <name>FAST!DiskROM for DDX-3.0 disk interfaces</name> <manufacturer>A & L Software</manufacturer> <code>FAST!DiskROM</code> <release_year>2006</release_year> <description>Double Sided Double Density port-based external floppy disk drive.</description> <type>external disk drive</type> </info> <devices> <primary slot="any"> <secondary slot="any"> <Microsol id="DDX_3.0"> <io base="0xD0" num="5"/> <broken_fdc_read>false</broken_fdc_read> <drives>1</drives> <mem base="0x4000" size="0x4000"/> <rom> <filename>roms/fastdrom_ddx3.0.rom</filename> <sha1>f2da984b2076a00d7359df4803fccdc0552b0e5d</sha1> </rom> </Microsol> </secondary> </primary> </devices> </msxconfig> It has a different name and has a different sha1sum. Now, which one to add? And why is the sha1sum different anyway? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=421864&aid=3368252&group_id=38274 |